<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RepeatGeek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://repeatgeek.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://repeatgeek.com</link>
	<description>Helping geeks achieve success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:31:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To View Inception Through Code by dhirschl</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>dhirschl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Max, thanks for your reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, thanks for your reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To View Inception Through Code by Max Loh</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Loh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Some of these analogies are a stretch, but the stack and thread ones make sense. 

@Rick Inception did not mean to portray machine-induced dreams as regular, everyday dreams. Machine-induced dreams are way crazier and involve multiple levels and sharing; it is not claiming that the normal dreams in its world have these special properties as well. 

That means you can&#039;t apply any current knowledge of &quot;normal dreams&quot; to machine-induced dreams, because they are in Inception&#039;s sci-fi mesh of &quot;unknown technology.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of these analogies are a stretch, but the stack and thread ones make sense. </p>
<p>@Rick Inception did not mean to portray machine-induced dreams as regular, everyday dreams. Machine-induced dreams are way crazier and involve multiple levels and sharing; it is not claiming that the normal dreams in its world have these special properties as well. </p>
<p>That means you can&#8217;t apply any current knowledge of &#8220;normal dreams&#8221; to machine-induced dreams, because they are in Inception&#8217;s sci-fi mesh of &#8220;unknown technology.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To View Inception Through Code by Rick</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Nice post and at the same time pretty much sums up why Inception sucked, our dreams can&#039;t be reduced to code, but Inception can.  Nolan even proposes stabilized time in dreams, talk about reductionism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post and at the same time pretty much sums up why Inception sucked, our dreams can&#8217;t be reduced to code, but Inception can.  Nolan even proposes stabilized time in dreams, talk about reductionism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To View Inception Through Code by How To View Inception Through Code &#124; Zocials</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>How To View Inception Through Code &#124; Zocials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-366</guid>
		<description>[...] by admin on Saturday Jul 31, 2010 Under Zocials        submitted by  repeatgeek  to  programming  [link] [5 comments] Social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by admin on Saturday Jul 31, 2010 Under Zocials        submitted by  repeatgeek  to  programming  [link] [5 comments] Social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To View Inception Through Code by === popurls.com === popular today</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>=== popurls.com === popular today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-365</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;=== popurls.com === popular today...&lt;/strong&gt;

yeah! this story has entered the popular today section on popurls.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>=== popurls.com === popular today&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>yeah! this story has entered the popular today section on popurls.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Types of Comments to Avoid Making in Your Code by Piotr Jagielski</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/career/5-types-of-comments-to-avoid-making-in-your-code/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Piotr Jagielski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=511#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Nice :-) I haven&#039;t read Code Complete but Clean Code by Uncle Bob has a good chapter about using comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice <img src='http://repeatgeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I haven&#8217;t read Code Complete but Clean Code by Uncle Bob has a good chapter about using comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Types of Comments to Avoid Making in Your Code by Mortaza Doulaty</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/career/5-types-of-comments-to-avoid-making-in-your-code/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Mortaza Doulaty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=511#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing. I&#039;m about 10% some day programmer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing. I&#8217;m about 10% some day programmer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Types of Comments to Avoid Making in Your Code by Philip Tellis</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/career/5-types-of-comments-to-avoid-making-in-your-code/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Tellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=511#comment-316</guid>
		<description>I wrote about commenting a while ago based on advice from the Elements of Programming Style:
http://tech.bluesmoon.info/2008/05/commenting.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about commenting a while ago based on advice from the Elements of Programming Style:<br />
<a href="http://tech.bluesmoon.info/2008/05/commenting.html" rel="nofollow">http://tech.bluesmoon.info/2008/05/commenting.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Types of Comments to Avoid Making in Your Code by Vince</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/career/5-types-of-comments-to-avoid-making-in-your-code/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=511#comment-313</guid>
		<description>My top comment that  I have found after getting a report from our Customer Support people that something wasnt working is this:

// Code goes here..

This has now become a kind of in-joke when someone raises a problem in an area that we suspect the same ex-programmer worked on :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My top comment that  I have found after getting a report from our Customer Support people that something wasnt working is this:</p>
<p>// Code goes here..</p>
<p>This has now become a kind of in-joke when someone raises a problem in an area that we suspect the same ex-programmer worked on <img src='http://repeatgeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Types of Comments to Avoid Making in Your Code by cm</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/career/5-types-of-comments-to-avoid-making-in-your-code/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>cm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=511#comment-311</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen commented out code in production.

One case was a one liner to put in a timeout.  It was &quot;removed&quot; because invoked code in a dll needed to do the timeout instead.  It was difficult to debug to find why the app was ending.

So two problems - the line was just commented out, and no reason for that was given.  Inviting anyone in the future to re-enable the code and create the problem all over again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen commented out code in production.</p>
<p>One case was a one liner to put in a timeout.  It was &#8220;removed&#8221; because invoked code in a dll needed to do the timeout instead.  It was difficult to debug to find why the app was ending.</p>
<p>So two problems &#8211; the line was just commented out, and no reason for that was given.  Inviting anyone in the future to re-enable the code and create the problem all over again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
