<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To View Inception Through Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/</link>
	<description>Helping geeks achieve success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<meta name="generator" content="deStyle 0.9.3" />
	<item>
		<title>By: How To View Golden Globe Nominee Inception Via Code &#124; Wonder How Do I</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>How To View Golden Globe Nominee Inception Via Code &#124; Wonder How Do I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 07:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>[...] over at RepeatGeek wrote an article called How To View Inception Through Code, which compares the film to coding, which seem to be remarkably [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over at RepeatGeek wrote an article called How To View Inception Through Code, which compares the film to coding, which seem to be remarkably [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhirschl</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>dhirschl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-909</guid>
		<description>Thanks - you are correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; you are correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-908</guid>
		<description>I believe your explanation of the stack is flawed.  Stacks are always LIFO (Last in, first out).  Wikipedia has a good definition of how a stack works and how it is defined as a LIFO.

&quot;In a stack, the topmost item, which is added last, is taken out first. Hence a stack is a LIFO structure.&quot;

So in the Inception stack, we see that level 5 was &quot;Last In&quot; and is the first to be popped off the stack, hence LIFO.  You should update the article to state that Inception follows the LIFO paradigm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe your explanation of the stack is flawed.  Stacks are always LIFO (Last in, first out).  Wikipedia has a good definition of how a stack works and how it is defined as a LIFO.</p>
<p>&#8220;In a stack, the topmost item, which is added last, is taken out first. Hence a stack is a LIFO structure.&#8221;</p>
<p>So in the Inception stack, we see that level 5 was &#8220;Last In&#8221; and is the first to be popped off the stack, hence LIFO.  You should update the article to state that Inception follows the LIFO paradigm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhirschl</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>dhirschl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-789</guid>
		<description>Nice Catch. This has now been updated. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Catch. This has now been updated. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Knippen</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Knippen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-788</guid>
		<description>There is a typo in step one of the stack, it says it uses FIFO, which is correct, but then explains that it is First-In, Last-Out (FIFO) manner. It Should be First-In, First-Out. Great Article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a typo in step one of the stack, it says it uses FIFO, which is correct, but then explains that it is First-In, Last-Out (FIFO) manner. It Should be First-In, First-Out. Great Article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Not really impressed with your logic...

maybe a loop for checking the condition of the Kick?... and death...

Movie had a &quot;glitch&quot; (in my opinion) how did they get the drug into  dream? should have used some phsichy trick...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really impressed with your logic&#8230;</p>
<p>maybe a loop for checking the condition of the Kick?&#8230; and death&#8230;</p>
<p>Movie had a &#8220;glitch&#8221; (in my opinion) how did they get the drug into  dream? should have used some phsichy trick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All things Inception &#124; Lens</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>All things Inception &#124; Lens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-397</guid>
		<description>[...] More programming link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More programming link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamalcom</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>kamalcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Nice comparison and nice movie :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice comparison and nice movie <img src='http://repeatgeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prabhakar</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Prabhakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 05:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-391</guid>
		<description>I think similarly. 
I see everything as a recursion, where a kick is the terminating condition. 

Limbo is a special case where the recursive loop never terminates due because of the corruption of the terminating condition due to buffer overflow (lol)

And sedation is the parameter passed to the recursive function that controls the recursion duration. Similar to your thread timeout logic. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think similarly.<br />
I see everything as a recursion, where a kick is the terminating condition. </p>
<p>Limbo is a special case where the recursive loop never terminates due because of the corruption of the terminating condition due to buffer overflow (lol)</p>
<p>And sedation is the parameter passed to the recursive function that controls the recursion duration. Similar to your thread timeout logic. <img src='http://repeatgeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Darcy</title>
		<link>http://repeatgeek.com/technical/how-to-view-inception-through-code/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Darcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 05:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repeatgeek.com/?p=529#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Another summary of Inception in code:
 
&quot;Understanding Inception using try-with-resources&quot;
http://blogs.sun.com/darcy/entry/understanding_inception_using_try_with</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another summary of Inception in code:</p>
<p>&#8220;Understanding Inception using try-with-resources&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://blogs.sun.com/darcy/entry/understanding_inception_using_try_with" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sun.com/darcy/entry/understanding_inception_using_try_with</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

